The textbooks speak of the radiometric dating techniques, and the dates themselves, as factual information.Far from being data, these dates are actually interpretations of the data.
Creationists do not necessarily disagree with this concept, but it can only be applied to layers that are found in one location and/or can be determined to have been deposited in a continuous layer over a very wide area.
There is also a difference in the timescale used to explain the layers.
The textbooks focus on relative dating, based on the layering of the rocks, and radiometric dating.
Relative ages are assigned to rocks based on the idea that rock layers lower in the strata were deposited before rock layers that are higher.
It is technically casting the spell and it is red, so I say yes but wanted someone else’s opinion.